Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. BF Goodrich

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1992No. 72080Published

1DissentKauger, Justice

Because the Legislature is constitutionally precluded from delegating its legislative duties to private parties,1 I dissent from the majority’s opinion which gives efficacy to the American Medical Association’s “Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment” (AMA Guides).

This Court is required by 12 O.S.1981 § 2201 to take judicial notice of the constitution.2 Courts are required to consider all applicable constitutional, statutory, and de-*598cisional law applicable to a cause.3 Since this Court’s decision in 1941 in First Nat’l Bank v. Southland Prod. Co., 189 Okl. 9, 112 P.2d 1087, 1098-99…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sterling Refining Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. First Nat. Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. American Home Products Corporation v. HomseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API