Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Austin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1926No. 16971Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, O.

The action in this case was brought in the justice of the peace court. Maggie xlustin, who was plaintiff, alleged, in substance, that she was the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of lot 8 in block 2, Business Men’s addition to the city of Sapulpa; that defendants were guilty of unlawful and forcible detention of same, and in possession of that part of said lot on which the house was situated. The defendants answered by general denial, and further pleaded possession under color of title; that plaintiff had never been in possession of said premises, and the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pettis Et Ux. v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. National Live Stock Commission Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Link v. SchlegelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Northcutt v. BastableSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Iralson v. StangSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API