Legal Opinion

Broward County v. Rhodes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 1, 1993No. 92-3307PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We reverse a partial summary judgment in an action for inverse condemnation holding the county liable for damages incident to the destruction of Plaintiffs’ bees in executing a mosquito control spray program. There is evidence that the mosquito spraying was an emergency measure designed to control an encephalitis crisis.

Appellees correctly assert that inverse condemnation applies to personal property. See State, Dep’t of Agric. and Consumer Servs. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc., 541 So.2d 1243 (Fla.2d DCA 1989), decision *320approved, in part, 570 So.2d 892 (Fla.1990); In re:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DEPT. OF AGR. AND CONSUMER SERVS. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Rabin v. Lake Worth Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. In re Forfeiture of 1976 Kenworth Tractor Trailer Truck, Altered Vin 243340MSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. STATE, DEPT. OF AGR. & CONS. SERV. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Conner v. Reed Bros., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allianz Global Risks U.S. Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. Perry v. Grand River Dam AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER v. Basore of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INS. CO. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Lewis v. County of OrangeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API