Legal Opinion

McCoy v. State, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1986No. 85AP-773PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.

Defendant, the state of Ohio, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, appeals from an $18,000 judgment entered against it in the Court of Claims as the result of an injury sustained by plaintiff, Russell McCoy, an inmate of the Chillicothe Correctional Institute, while he was working on the prison farm located on prison premises.

Yearling bulls, each weighing four hundred to five hundred fifty pounds, were enclosed in a fenced corral while waiting to undergo castration. Two chutes parallel to one another opened off the corral, and it was the responsibility of plaintiff to operate a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fondern v. Dept. of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Menke v. HauberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Fox v. Victory Ice Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feichtner v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. McCoy v. EngleOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API