Legal Opinion

State v. Flack

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Miami District Court. Prosecution for grand larceny. From a conviction at the October term, 1891, the defendant, Flack, appeals. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was a criminal prosecution, upon an information filed in the district court of Miami county, on July 28, 1891, charging the defendant, George Flack, with the larceny of an iron-gray gelding, and a saddle and bridle, the property of W. A. Tomlinson. A trial was had before the court and a jury, and the defendant was found guilty, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of four years; and from this sentence he now appeals to this court.

The first objection urged against the proceedings in the court below is, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  2. Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. Sultan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Starke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API