Legal Opinion

Simmonds v. Long

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1909No. 15,993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Kingman district court; PRESTON B. rGlLLETT, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

'The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

William Simmonds, the plaintiff, made a,written contract with Long & Sills to purchase 160 •acres of land, and deposited with them $150 as earnest-*156money and part payment on the purchase-price. The contract was dated December 14, 1906. By its terms possession, was to be given in sixty days, and time was made the essence of the contract. It was further agreed that if a good and sufficient deed and abstract could not be furnished the $150 earnest-money should be returned to Simmonds.

On February 18,1907, which was after the sixty days had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frankland v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hall v. CrandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Wallace v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Cabot v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Duncan, Sherman & Co. v. NilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gust v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cassimus v. Vaughn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Kremer v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Yates v. Garden City Sugar & Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Crosby v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API