Legal Opinion

State v. Velasquez

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1999No. 990097, 990098PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Leonardo Velasquez appealed from a conviction for two counts of delivery of a controlled substance. We conclude Velasquez’s rights to a fair trial were not violated and we affirm.

[¶ 2] Rosvel Gonzalez, after being charged with drug-related felonies, agreed to work with police as an informant. Gonzalez phoned Velasquez and they agreed to exchange drugs for money. Gonzalez was to pay $2,800 to Velasquez for one ounce of cocaine and one ounce of methamphetamine. After phoning Velasquez, Gonzalez notified police he was arranging a purchase of drugs and the police…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. State v. HillingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wills v. Schroeder Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. MessnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Bernhardt v. F.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. StockertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. KeyesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Bismarck v. McCormickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API