State v. Velasquez
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Leonardo Velasquez appealed from a conviction for two counts of delivery of a controlled substance. We conclude Velasquez’s rights to a fair trial were not violated and we affirm.
[¶ 2] Rosvel Gonzalez, after being charged with drug-related felonies, agreed to work with police as an informant. Gonzalez phoned Velasquez and they agreed to exchange drugs for money. Gonzalez was to pay $2,800 to Velasquez for one ounce of cocaine and one ounce of methamphetamine. After phoning Velasquez, Gonzalez notified police he was arranging a purchase of drugs and the police…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- State v. HillingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Wills v. Schroeder Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. MessnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Bernhardt v. F.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. StockertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KeyesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Bismarck v. McCormickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.