State v. Azure
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶1 Following a four-day jury trial in January 2004, Donald Azure (Azure) was convicted by unanimous verdict of felony deliberate homicide and felony criminal endangerment. He appeals on the grounds that the jury was impaneled improperly and that the District Court gave an erroneous jury instruction for the charge of criminal endangerment. We affirm.
ISSUES
¶2 A restatement of the issues on appeal is:
¶3 Was Azure’s jury venire improperly impaneled?
¶4 Did the District Court correctly instruct the jury on the elements of criminal endangerment?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶5 Azure was charged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. LaMereMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LambertMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BingmanMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AzureMontana Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HausauerMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. IlkMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Kalem JohnstonMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JohnstonMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SecreaseMontana Supreme Court · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.