Legal Opinion
Iannarone v. Caso
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
The Iannarones, who reside in Inwood in the Town of Hempstead, object to the rezoning of land within 100 feet of their residence, claiming that:
1. The rezoning application was first voted on by the Town Board of Hempstead and failed to receive a majority vote. The next week, the Town Board voted again, and passed, by a simple majority, the same rezoning application, improperly, because it did not then hold a new public hearing.
*2132. The resolution granting the zoning was ineffective because a protest had been filed by the owners of at least 20% of the requisite adjoining area and that under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Mill Neck v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Village of Mill Neck v. NolanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESSSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Rabasco v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Rabasco v. Town of GreenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Smithtown v. HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Coutant v. Town of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Caruso v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Vizzi v. Town of IslipNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Schaus v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.