Legal Opinion

Village of Mill Neck v. Nolan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1932PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the zoning ordinance was not adopted in conformity with the provisions of section 178 of the Village Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 64), in that substantial and extensive changes were made by the Board of Trustees subsequent to the public hearing held upon the proposed ordinance without any new public hearing upon such changes and amendments; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ.

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Town of SardiniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Hall v. LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESSSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. Town of NewburghNew York Supreme Court · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API