Legal Opinion
Deckard v. Adams
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1965No. 30,711PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAchor, J.
The above matter is before us on petition to transfer, under Supreme Court Rule 2-23. [For Appellate Court opinion, see: Deckard v. Adams (1964), 197 N. E. 2d 317.]
Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the petition, on the grounds that it does not conform to requirements of Rule 2-23, in that the brief in support of the petition is not separate therefrom.
The applicable part of Rule 2-23 is as follows:
“A petition to transfer a cause from the Appellate Court to the Supreme Court shall be separate from the briefs in support thereof...
Briefs may be filed with and in support of the *125petition but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Fowler v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HenbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Harper v. JamesIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Dorweiler v. SinksIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Dill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- FMC Corp. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Hoffman v. E.W. Bliss Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
- FMC Corp. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Coffey v. WiningerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.