Legal Opinion
AAB Joint Venture v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 2007No. Nos. 04-1719 C, 05-114 C, 05-1172 C, 06-49 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court in this government contract ease is Plaintiffs Motion for Order Compelling Discovery with Respect to Defendant’s Answers to Interrogatories in Case Nos. 04-1719C, 04-1792C1 and 05-144C. For the reasons set forth below Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.
I. Background
A.A.B. Joint Venture (“AAB”) entered into a contract with the government on June 5, 2001, to design and construct a storage and logistics base in Elad, Israel for use by the Israeli Defense Force (“IDF”). Am. Compl. in Case No. 04-1719, If 4, 6. Attached to…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stern v. O'QuinnDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Spirit Master Funding, LLC v. Pike Nurseries Acquisition, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Ak-Chin Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.