Legal Opinion

Brigham v. . Tillinghast

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1855PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The question to be decided is whether the assignment of Clark Tillinghast is void on its face. The assigned property consists of real and personal estate which is conveyed to trustees to be disposed of by them and the proceeds applied to the payment of the debts of the assignor, in the order named in the instrument. By our laws trusts may be created to sell property for the payment of debts. But these trusts, when created and declared, must be capable of being…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kyle v. HarveysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Reagan v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bennett v. EllisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  4. McCleery v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Warner v. LakeNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API