Legal Opinion

Warner v. Lake

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Chautauqua county. Action by William H. Warner against Clarence H. Lake. From a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial on a case and exceptions, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The action was for the alleged wrongful conversion of a stock of goods claimed by the plaintiff, as assignee for the benefit of creditors of one Benjamin F. Williams. The goods were seized and sold by the defendant as sheriff of Chautauqua county, by virtue of executions in favor of the judgment creditors of one Charles F. Williams, and as the property of the latter. The final question, of fact and law, was whether, at the time of the levy and sale, the goods in question were the property of the plaintiff as such, assignee, or of Charles F. Williams, the judgment debtor. On the 9th day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. McConnell v. . SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Brigham v. . TillinghastNew York Court of Appeals · 1855

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CondonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  2. Buell v. RopeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. C. R. Remington & Son v. Central Press Ass'n, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1896
  4. Warner v. LakeNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API