Legal Opinion

State v. Antwine

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 29, 1980No. 50,906PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

This is a direct appeal by the defendants from their conviction of one count of robbery in violation of K.S.A. 21-3426.

The defendants were tried on twelve counts of aggravated robbery and each was convicted on one count of robbing Cecil Weber. From the record before us, it appears that Mitchell McHenry was convicted by virtue of aiding and abetting James E. Antwine. The charges arose out of an incident that occurred at a dice game in Topeka, Kansas. The evidence is highly conflicting, but sufficient evidence was presented to the jury which, if believed, would have supported either…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State v. Sullivan & SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Harold S. Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. State v. McCorgarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. State v. SmolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State v. BeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. State v. WiseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API