Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1983No. 18617PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

The defendants, Patricia S., William J. and Daniel H. Johnson,1 appeal from jury convictions of theft by deception in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-405. We reverse the convictions.

For eleven of the past fifteen years, Patricia Johnson has worked for Hillhaven Convalescent Centers (hereinafter “Hillha-ven”). Since October of 1976, she has been the administrator of the Ogden Hillhaven facility. Prior to March of 1977, the maintenance work at the Ogden Hillhaven facility was poor. In March of 1977, Daniel Johnson was hired to perform the maintenance work. The defendants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. KerekesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CrevistonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. ForsythUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. EmmettUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. TroyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. LarrabeeUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. BolsingerUtah Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API