Legal Opinion
Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Boesch
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1975No. 74-162PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCelebbezze, J.
The basic question before the court is whether the Administrative Procedure Act (R. C. Chapter 119) applies to approval of the establishment of a building and loan branch pursuant to R. C. 1151.05.
R. C. 1151.05 provides that:
“No building and loan association shall establish more than one office, or maintain branches other than those established before July 3, 1923, nor relocate any branch, except with the approval of the Superintendent of Building and Loan Associations previously had in writing.”
Home Savings argues that the written approval required above is a “liceniing function” sufficient…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Abt v. Ohio Expositions CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Total Office Prod. v. Dept. Admin. Srvs., Unpublished Decision (6-29-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Genoa Banking Co v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Karvo Cos., Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State Ex Rel. Waterbury Development Co. v. WittenOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.