Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Waterbury Development Co. v. Witten
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 1977No. L-76-253PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
. POTTER; P. J.
This cause came on to be beard upon the pleadings, evidence, briefs, and arguments of counsel.
This is an original mandamus action, in, the Court of Appeals filed by the Waterbury Development Co. against Sally Witten, the Village Administrator for the Village 1 of Waterville. The plaintiff-relator’s application for a zoning permit 2 was denied since the plaintifi'-relatop refused to pay the following fees to the Village of 'Waterville: a water tap charge pursuant to Waterville Ordinance No. 21-76; a sanitary sewer tap charge pursuant to Water-ville Ordinance No. 22-76 3 ; and a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Education of City School District v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Himebaugh v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Towne Properties, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BoeschOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Strahan v. City of AuroraPortage County Court of Common Pleas · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Marion v. BaioniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Fairway Manor, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1983