Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Groov-Pin Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 13, 1936No. 148PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff is the owner of two patents for metal pins, Nos. 1,482,151, and 1,-978,145. We had the earlier of these before us in Rosenberg et al. v. Hassall, 73 F.(2d) 58, and held that the claims now in suit, Nos. 5, 6, 8 and 9, were valid and infringed. The plaintiff asserts that one of the defendant’s pins, Exhibit A., infringes these claims, which the defendant denies, coupling with that denial an attack upon their validity by a new reference not before us on the other appeal, British Patent No. 994 of 1865 issued to one, Brown. The judge held that Exhibit A. did…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1903
- Wilson v. Consolidated Store-Service Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898
- Dickerson v. De la Vergne Refrigerating Machine Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
- Edward Barr Co. v. New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
- Orr v. LittlefieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1845
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc., Caribe Chemical Company, Inc., Ellencee Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- White v. Leanore Frocks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Windmere Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.