Legal Opinion

Edward Barr Co. v. New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided August 18, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLacombe, J.

This is an application for a preliminar injunction to restrain defendants from infringing two patents owned, in whole or in part, by complainant. Both these patents cover improvements in apparatus for the automatic extinguishment of fires. The first patent, No. 307,456, was granted November 4, 1884, to Frank Gray, and it is contended that one claim only of such patent is infringed. The other patent, No. 357,987, was granted February 15, 1887, to William S. Gray, (jointly with Frank Gray,) and it is contended that it is infringed in its entirety.

Before a preliminary injunction to restrain…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Groov-Pin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. Newton Rubber WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1896
  4. Western Electric Co. v. Williams-Abbott Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
  5. McCaslin v. Link Belt Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API