Poorvu v. City of Nashua
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issue in this tax abatement case is whether the trial court committed reversible error by ruling that the plaintiff had failed to introduce evidence as to the true market value of any other properties in the city of Nashua. We hold that it did. Plaintiff is the owner of Riverview Garden, a three hundred forty-seven apartment complex situated on nine acres of land. The subject property was purchased by the plaintiff in 1972 for a total price of $1,625,000, of which $1,422,415 was for the land and buildings, and $202,585 was for certain personalty. The assessed value of the land and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paras v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Eames v. Southern New Hampshire Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Public Service Co. v. Town of AshlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Vickerry Realty Co. Trust v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Hodges v. KensingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shawmut Inn v. Inhabitants of KennebunkportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Berthiaume v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Appeal of City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Crown Paper Co. v. City of BerlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Milford Properties, Inc. v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.