Hodges v. Kensington
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The chief contention of the defendant is that there was insufficient evidence to support the findings and rulings of the Trial Court.
In tax abatement cases, if a plaintiff shows that his property is assessed at more than its market value, he must go further and show that his assessment is disproportionate to that of other property in the taxing district. Rollins v. Dover, 93 N. H. 448.
“The relief granted in a petition for an abatement is equitable in nature. The plaintiff is entitled to be relieved of such sum, if any, as it has paid in excess of the common burden. Amoskeag Mfg. Co. v.…
2Cited by10 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Paras v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Fitzsimmons v. McCorkleSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Berthiaume v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.