Eddy v. Kramer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suits by James Francis Eddy and the Dando Printing & Publishing Company against Henry E. C. Kramer, Joseph De Done, and Frank Hobson, individually and trading as the Quaker City Calendar Company, and the De Done Ehmling Company, Incorporated, and by James Francis Eddy against Charles E. Mather, Victor Mather, and Gilbert Mather, copartners trading as Mather & Co. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, District Judge.
James Francis Eddy and Dando Printing & Publishing Company filed their bills against the defendants in the above-stated causes, charging them with infringing the three claims of United States patent Ño. 1,153,543, and the first claim of United States patent No. 1,153,545. The three claims of the first-mentioned patent are as follows:
“1. The heroindescribed. pad ior daily date signs, comprising in combination a plurality of leaves, a cap consisting of a piece of sheet material bent longitudinally into channel form with its intermediate portion lying upon the top edges of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- National Cash-Register Co. v. LelandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
- Myers v. HettingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Dempster Mill Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dangler v. Imperial MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Robert Findlay Mfg. Co. v. Hygrade Lighting Fixture Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1923
- Eddy v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918