Robert Findlay Mfg. Co. v. Hygrade Lighting Fixture Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GARVIN, District Judge.
This is an application for an order making Samuel Shapiro, Morris Berman, Harry Cohn, Samuel Cominsky, and the Reliance Metal Spinning & Stamping Company parties to this action, or in the alternative granting plaintiff leave to file a supplemental bill, for the purpose of making Samuel Shapiro, Morris Ber-man, Harry Cohn, and the Reliance Metal Spinning & Stamping Company parties to this action.
[ 1 ] The case has gone to a decree. Considerable testimony has been taken before a master. That record establishes clearly that the parties sought to be brought before the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Coburn v. Cedar Valley Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wells & Richardson Co. v. AbrahamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1906
- New Jersey Patent Co. v. SchaefferU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Overman Cushion Tire Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Darman Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1940