Legal Opinion

Sincox v. Blackwell

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided August 31, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-0500PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, District Judge.

Defendants, attorney Murphy Blackwell, Jr., the law firm of Jones, Blackwell, Chambliss, Hobbs and Henry, and Employers Reinsurance Corporation have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P. 56, to dismiss plaintiff’s suit alleging professional malpractice and breach of contract by Mr. Blackwell. Defendants formerly raised some of the arguments asserted herein in the form of a Motion to Dismiss which we denied. The present motion, however, affords us an opportunity to reconsider these issues beyond the pleadings.

In January of 1975,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  2. Cartwright v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  3. Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. John Lee Sincox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Martin v. Mud Supply CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bernard McLaughlin Cross-Appellee v. Herman & Herman, and Lanny R. Zatzkis, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. John Lee Sincox v. Murphy Blackwell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Kalakay v. Farmers Insurance GroupMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API