Legal Opinion

Baltimore Pearl Hominy Co. v. Linthicum

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 11, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court Xo. 2 of Baltimore City (Sharp, J.-).

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court Xo. 2 of Baltimore City sustaining a demurrer to and dismissing the bill of complaint of the Baltimore Pearl Hominy Company against Seth H. Linthicum, Trustee.

The bill states that on the 2!th of October, 1905, the plaintiff and Eichmond H. Ford, trading as Eichmond H. Ford & Co., executed a written contract, “aud specifications' forming a part of same,” whereby the said Eichmond H. Ford & Co. “contracted and agreed to construct and build for the plaintiff” certain buildings and improvements “upon the property of the plaintiff at the southwest…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moale v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  2. Conner v. Groh, Doub & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. Atwell v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  4. Allen v. SowerbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  5. Zihlman v. Cumberland Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mayor of Federalsburg v. Allied Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Hercules Powder Co. v. Harry T. Campbell Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Crowder v. Master Financial, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. James L. Kernan Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  5. Nelson v. Chesapeake Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API