Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1951No. 12437PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, together with one Keane and one Grismer, were charged with devising and putting into execution a scheme to defraud purchasers and prospective pur chasers of stock of two Idaho corporations, —the Lucky Friday Extension Mining Company, for brevity referred to as “Extension”, and Pilot Silver-Lead Mines, Inc., here called “Pilot”.

The alleged false and fraudulent pre-tences, representations and promises were found principally in the allegation that the scheme devised was “that defendants would and did cause these corporations to sell ■ stock to investors upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Allis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Catrino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Charlton v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Aubrey WhartonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. State of Arizona v. Dennis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Helen A. Davenport v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. United States v. Bruce Anthony Collom, United States of America v. Stephen CollomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API