Hendrix v. Alsop
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
Because of the plaintiff’s action on 1 August 1969 of causing a summons to be issued and served upon the defendant Alsop under a caption different from that used upon the summons issued to Alsop in 1967; and because on 1 August-1969 plaintiff caused separate summons to be issued to the defendants Pfizer and Roerig; and because the record before us did not disclose whether a new action was instituted on 1 August 1969, we requested additional argument, upon briefs only, on the following question: “Did the issuance of summons on 1 August 1969 to defendant Alsop and the two corporate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Congleton v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- McFetters v. . McFettersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Marrison v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.