Legal Opinion

IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 14, 2022No. 0:18-cv-01776Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil No. 18-1776 (JRT/JFD) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT BETWEEN CONSUMER This Document Relates to: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS AND JBS DEFENDANTS AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND All Consumer Indirect Purchaser Plaintiff EXPENSES Actions After executing the class notice plan the Court approved for disseminating notice of a settlement the Court preliminarily approved, the Consumer Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Consumer IPPs”) filed a Motion for Final…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API