Legal Opinion

Vallé v. Cerré's

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. At the instance of the plaintiffs, the court gave the following declaration of law: ■“If the court, sitting as a jury, finds that the plaintiffs wrote the '¡ante — the letter to Titus, dated June 21,1859” (the letter of .credit authorizing Titus to draw for three-fourths of the value of actual shipment), “ which was read in evidence— that Titus received this letter prior to 6th August, 1859 ;…

Read the full summary

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. At the instance of the plaintiffs, the court gave the following declaration of law: ■“If the court, sitting as a jury, finds that the plaintiffs wrote the '¡ante — the letter to Titus, dated June 21,1859” (the letter of .credit authorizing Titus to draw for three-fourths of the value of actual shipment), “ which was read in evidence— that Titus received this letter prior to 6th August, 1859 ; that lie thereupon shipped to the plaintiffs at St. Louis, on the steamboat .Gladiator, the 300 sacks of coffee in the…

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, Judge

This case was affirmed at the March term of this court, 1864, and a re-hearing was granted at the same term. The reasons for the decision were somewhat briefly stated, and in such manner as to lead to the supposition that the case had not received that careful consideration on some points which the importance of the questions involved, might seem to demand. It has been re-argued with much learning and abil*583ity, and we have given the subject the most attentive deliberation.

The case may be stated in substance as follows: The plaintiff, a merchant of St. Louis, and one A. Titus a merchant of New…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis & Aubin v. John Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  2. "Board of Public Education in Wilmington" v. DelaneySupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  3. Ulster County Bank v. McFarlanCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  4. Desha, Sheppard & Co. v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  5. Ryberg v. SnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1809

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Green v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Ober v. Indianapolis & St. Louis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. State ex rel. Kendrick v. HudsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. First National Bank v. McAndrewsMontana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hutchings v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API