Legal Opinion

Ryberg v. Snell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a motion to take off the nonsuit ordered at the trial. Ryberg v. Snell [Casé .No. 12,189].

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice.

The stress of the argument by the plaintiff’s counsel, on this motion, is. that a bill of lading conveys to the consignee a legal title to the property; that a factor, being such consignee, and a creditor of the consignor, for the ‘balance of a former account, has equal equity with a person who, bona fide, and for valuable consideration, becomes a purchaser of the property from the consignor, even before possession is acquired by the factor, and is therefore entitled to hold it until his debt is satisfied.

The whole error of this argument, consists in thé generality…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Booker v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Vallé v. Cerré'sSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Lineker v. AyeshfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API