Legal Opinion
Jungkunz v. Fifth Third Bank
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1994No. C-930793PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, Robert L. and Joan M. Jungkunz, appeal from the summary judgment granted by the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendant-appellee, Fifth Third Bank (“bank”). The trial court held that appellants’ claims against the bank were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On June 2,1993, appellants filed their amended complaint in which they alleged that on January 31, 1991, the bank unlawfully seized appellants’ Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) in the amount of $76,396.45, and set it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rogers v. City of WhitehallOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- James A. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Sanders v. City of Brady, TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Galvan v. Galvan (In Re Galvan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sanders v. City of Brady (In re Brady, Texas, Municipal Gas Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cabrera v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF WHEATONAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Bollinger, Inc. v. MayersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Federated Management Co. v. Latham & WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Puget Sound National Bank v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Badovick v. GreenspanOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.