State v. Moore
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
Each of the defendants assigns error to the denial of his motions to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search of the house. Each of the defendants made two motions to suppress. At a hearing on their first motions the court considered only the application for the search warrant in determining whether there was probable cause to issue the warrant. The appellants contend the affidavit of Mr. Call was not sufficient to support a finding of probable cause. The United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed. 2d 527 (1983) held that in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PaytonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016