Legal Opinion

Central Pharmacal Co. v. Salb

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1938No. 15,470PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The appellant’s action in the trial court was tried upon its second amended complaint in two paragraphs alleging in substance that it was the owner of a trade secret of which the appellee Salb, as its employee, had acquired knowledge, and was intending to use it and to divulge the secret to others in violation of his obligations to the appellant and to its great and irreparable damage unless the injunction sought by the second amended complaint be granted. Each paragraph was answered in general denial.

Trial was had before the court and upon proper request a special finding of facts was made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Nading v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Mertz, Admr. v. WallaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Town of Hagerstown v. Liberty Light & Power Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wade v. CulpIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Bulen v. Pendleton Banking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Black v. KraussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Carr v. TroutmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Smith v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API