Legal Opinion

Inbesa America, Inc. v. M/V Anglia

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 2, 1998No. 96-5278PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we determine whether a contract for various shipping-related services comes within the federal admiralty jurisdiction. In granting summary judgment for appellee Inbesa America, Inc. (“Inbesa”), the district court held that a contract between Inbesa and the charterer of in rem appellant M/V Anglia was wholly maritime, thereby bringing all disputes arising under the contract within the federal admiralty jurisdiction. The Anglia, however, contends that the contract is not subject to admiralty jurisdiction because the contract covers a variety of non-maritime…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. In Re the Complaint of the Sea Vessel, Inc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as the Owner of the M/v Sea Lion v v. Juan ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. The Rock Island BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. Commercial Investment Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District v. M/V BelleDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
  3. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Hanjin Shipping Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  4. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Atlantic Pacific International, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1999
  5. Stickelber v. FisherDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API