Legal Opinion
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Hanjin Shipping Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 14, 2002No. 00 C 5226PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NORGLE, District Judge.
The court has conducted a bench trial in this matter. What follows constitutes the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). To the extent that a finding of fact as stated may be considered a conclusion of law, it shall be considered as a conclusion of law. Similarly, to the extent that a conclusion of law as stated may be considered a finding of fact, it shall be considered as a finding of fact. See Allergy Asthma Tech., Ltd. v. I Can Breathe, Inc., 195 F.Supp.2d…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. v. Titan Textile Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Hanjin Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. v. Titan Textile Company, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Indemnity Insurance Company Of North America v. Hanjin Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003