Legal Opinion

Erstling v. Trinity Wesleyan Methodist Church

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 28, 1958No. 57-28PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Chancellor in this cause determined that a deed was' in actuality a mort*75gage under Section 697.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. This finding was made on the basis of controverted testimony and there being sufficient evidence in the record upon which to sustain the finding it will not be disturbed upon appeal. The Chancellor declined to include in the sum of the mortgage an amount claimed as attorney’s fees for services expended by the defendants upon the finding that these fees were incurred in connection with another controversy. The appellants having failed to demonstrate error in this finding, it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldstein v. StoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miami Station, Inc. v. Coplan Pipe & Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API