Goldstein v. Stone
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this Court. It is apparent to the Court upon perusal of the record that the Chancellor below based his findings upon conflicting evidence. We follow the rule so often enunciated by the Supreme Court of this State that the findings of a Chancellor based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous. Cobb v. Cobb, 82 Fla. 287, 89 So. 869; Grantham v. Grantham, 140 Fla. 120, 191 So. 197; Peterson v. Plancock, 146 Fla. 410, 1 So.2d 255; Monyak v. Monyak,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cobb v. CobbSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Loew v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Peterson v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Grantham v. GranthamSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mann v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Vandercar v. DavidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
- Marx v. GoldfingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Erstling v. Trinity Wesleyan Methodist ChurchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958