Legal Opinion
Panhandle Const. Co. v. City of Spearman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 18, 1935No. 4509PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The city of Spearman sued the appellant, Construction Company, to recover the value of 7,880 yards of caliche alleged to be of the value of 10 cents per cubic yard, which the city claimed had been removed from land which it owned by the appellant without the knowledge and consent of the city.
The appellant answered that if it entered upon the lands belonging to the city it was with the knowledge and consent of said city, under an agreement that appellant should have the caliche free of charge; that the city was endeavoring to let paving contracts for the improvement of certain of its streets,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sluder v. City of San AntonioTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Markham v. CarothersTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- McKenzie Const. Co. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- City of Port Arthur v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. CrabbTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Corpus Christi v. GreggTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Bonham v. Southwest Sanitation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- City of Nederland v. CallihanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- The Gamewell Company, a Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- International Bank of Commerce of Laredo v. Union National Bank of LaredoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.