Legal Opinion

City of Port Arthur v. Young

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1931No. 2058PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the 10th day of April, 1916, the Port Arthur Pleasure Pier Company, by its deed in writing, conveyed to C. E. Dunstan the pleasure pier property in issue in this case, situated near the city of Port Arthur. Dunstan took the property subject to the conditions under which it was being operated by permission of the United States government and to the rights of all other interested parties. Previous to the date of this deed the pleasure pier property had been operated for a long time as a pleasure pier, strictly on a business basis, with charges made to the public for the entertainment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Belton v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Henrietta Country Club v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Corpus Christi v. GreggTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Emmord's Inc. v. ObermillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Lincoln Park Traps v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  4. Panhandle Const. Co. v. City of SpearmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. City of Staples v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API