Dawson v. Canteen Corp.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Neely, Justice:
For many years West Virginians suffering injuries as the result of defective products have been unable to recover against defendant manufacturers, wholesalers, or retailers for breach of warranty unless they stood in privity of contract with the defendant. At the same time West Virginia manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers selling products nationally have been exposed to extensive liability for defective products manufactured in this State and sold elsewhere because the majority of American jurisdictions have abolished privity as a requirement in warranty actions.
The case…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Payne v. Valley Motor Sales, IncorporatedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Williams v. Chrysler CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. County Court of Pleasants County v. AndersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by27 opinions
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Sewell v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Eastern Steel Constructors, Inc. v. City of SalemWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Hill v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.