Legal Opinion

Royal Bank of Canada v. Girard

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 6, 1927Published

1Opinion

The exception to the findings of facts is too general to be available. No particular finding is pointed out, nor is any particular fault indicated. Landon v. Hunt, 82 Vt. 322,73 A. 865; Eastern States, etc., League v. Estate of Vail, 97 Vt. 495,124 A. 568, 38 A.L.R. 845.

Since there is no available exception to the findings, we will not look back of them to ascertain whether the evidence supports the judgment. Laplante v. Camp, 96 Vt. 412, 120 A. 860. And the exception to the judgment raises only the question whether the findings are such as to support the judgment. Morgan v. Gould,96 Vt. 275,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morgan v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Eastern States Agricultural & Industrial League v. Estate of VailSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Kettle v. HarveySupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  4. Lynds v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  5. Burnap v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API