Legal Opinion

Lynds v. Town of Plymouth

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 22, 1901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Case for injuries received on a highway bridge or culvert. Trial by jury, Windsor County, December Term, 1899, Tyler, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The witnesses Tarbell, Wilson, Green, the Slacks and the Hubbards, referred to in the opinion, testified to accidents that had befallen them in driving over the bridge in question.

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

Eight questions reserved upon trial have been argued by the defendant’s counsel.

I. The defendant claims that the structure where the accident happened was not a bridge. The court ruled that it was a “broken down bridge” and to this ruling the defendant *218excepted. In the notice to the town it is termed a “small bridge, otherwise called a culvert” and according to the lexicographers it might well in its original condition have been called either. The defendant claimed that the question whether it was a bridge or not should have been submitted to the jury, and so it should have been, had the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. North-Eastern Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
  2. Walker v. Town of WestfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
  3. Frary v. GushaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
  4. Stevens v. BeachSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
  5. Houston v. RussellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  2. Morgan v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  4. Graves v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  5. Temple Et Ux. v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API