Legal Opinion
Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 12, 1897No. Nos. 10,270—(23)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Egan, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought to enjoin the defendant from enforcing the following rule or by-law adopted by its board of directors on November 23, 1895, to wit:
“Resolved, that from this date freight trains and mixed trains of passenger and freight cars are hereby excluded from the passenger facilities in this company’s station, and shall be limited to the use of the company’s regular transfer facilities, except in cases of emergency when the regular transfer track is obstructed.”
When plaintiff rested, the court dismissed the action, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Paddock v. BalgordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- St. Paul Union Depot Co. v. Minnesota & Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Power v. Gainesville & Northwestern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Nadler v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914