Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Sather

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 2010No. 150712239; A137822PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Husband appeals a dissolution judgment that awarded wife spousal support of $5,000 per month until the end of 2012 and $4,000 per month thereafter. Husband’s only contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in setting the amount of spousal support, arguing that it leaves him with insufficient funds to maintain a standard of living that is sufficiently proportionate to the standard of living that the parties enjoyed during their marriage. We agree with husband and, accordingly, modify the trial court’s support award.

We review the facts de novo. ORS 19.415(3) (2007). The parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of AlbrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. In re the Marriage of SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. In re the Marriage of RoppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. In re the Marriage of OlesbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. In re the Marriage of WeakleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Marriage of AbramsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API