Legal Opinion
Moroney v. Mayor of Old Tappan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 8, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
COLEMAN, P.J.A.D.
This case requires us to decide whether there has been an administrative taking of plaintiffs’ land through zoning regulations requiring the payment of just compensation.
*461Plaintiffs are the owners of an undersized, isolated lot located in the Borough of Old Tappan (Borough) which does not meet the requirements of the local zoning ordinance for construction of a single family house. Plaintiffs were denied a hardship variance to construct a single family house on the lot because they failed to satisfy the negative criteria of N.J.S.A.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Med. Ctr. v. TP. OF PRINCETON ZONING BD. OF ADJ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Karam v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- 41 MAPLE ASSOC. v. Common CouncilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Moroney v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF OLD TAPPANSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- JESSE D. SADEJ VS. ANTHONY X. ARTURI, JR., ESQ. (L-2077-12, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.