In Re Tracey
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
PAUL MANNES, Chief Judge.
Madison National Bank and Baltimore Federal Financial object to confirmation of debtors’ proposed Chapter 13 plan. These creditors allege that the debtor’s 72-year old mother is not a “dependent” for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(2)(A) and that money used by debtors for her support should be devoted to plan payments. The court finds, absent a statutory definition of the word “dependent” in the Bankruptcy Code, that based on the facts and circumstances of this case debtor’s mother is a “dependent” of debtor, as that word is used in §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Stuart R. And Shiela M. Terry, Debtors, A. L. Tenney, Trustee v. Stuart R. And Shiela M. Terry, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- In Re ChaseDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- In Re ChaseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1983
- Lewiston Seaport Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Prine (In Re Prine)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re RigdonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1991
- In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Andrews v. Loheit (In Re Andrews)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Rutherford v. William D. Ford Direct Loan Program (In Re Rutherford)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
- Dunn v. Dunn (In Re Dunn)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.