Andrews v. Loheit (In Re Andrews)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge:
The bankruptcy court sustained an objection by the Chapter 13 trustee to the confirmation of the debtors’ Chapter 13 plan of reorganization. Although numerous issues are raised in this appeal, the sole basis for denial of confirmation by the bankruptcy court was that the plan provided for payments extending over a period longer than three years without court approval as required under § 1322(c). We AFFIRM.
I. FACTS
Debtor/Appellants William and Elena Andrews (the “Andrews”) filed their Chapter 13 1 petition concurrently with their Plan of Reorganization on February 28,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Matter of DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Phoenix Institute of Technology v. Klein (In Re Klein)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Cleve Jackson Howell, Bankrupt. Frank Mirgon, Elaine Mirgon v. Cleve Jackson Howell, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re TraceyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re William Andrews Elana Andrews, Debtors. William Andrews Elana Andrews v. Lawrence J. Loheit, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Meyer v. Lepe (In Re Lepe)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Stevens v. Baxter (In Re Stevens)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
- Ingram v. BurchardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Alan R. Burnsed and Beverly Amber BurnsedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.