Voelkel v. Succession of Aurich
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George Henry Théard, Judge. Action by William E. Voelkel, Jr., against the succession of Catherine Aurich. From a judgment dismissing rule taken on behalf of the succession, it appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a rule taken on behalf of the succession of Miss Catherine Aurich to compel P. H. Quinlan to accept title to certain real estate which had been adjudicated to him, and condemning the succession to return to said Quinlan the sum of $520 deposited by him, together with legal interest from the day of the deposit. The appellee answers, praying that he be allowed damages as for frivolous appeal.
The facts are: That in January, 1904, EWald, Catherine, Laura, Tillie, Pauline, and Viola Aurich (Tillie Aurich being the wife of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- National Rice Milling Co. v. New Orleans & N. E. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Succession of Preston v. BradySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- McCormick v. Alfred S. Amer Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- In the Matter of the Succession of WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Lane v. Mud Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.