Legal Opinion
Lane v. Mud Supply Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1959No. 20312PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McBRIDE, Judge.
This is the other of the consolidated suits which arose out of the automobile accident discussed in our opinion this day handed down in the case of Martin v. Mud Supply Company, Inc., La.App., 111 So.2d 375.
We are now concerned with the claim for damages resulting from bodily injuries sustained by Leon E. Lane, one of the hitchhikers, who was a minor. The suit was brought by his father appearing as plaintiff “for himself individually,” claiming medical expenses, and “for and on behalf of his minor son, Leon E. Lane” claiming damages for the minor’s personal injuries. Mud Supply…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Succession of MarkhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Martin v. Mud Supply CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Siragusa v. Illinois Cent. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Hanna v. OtisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Voelkel v. Succession of AurichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Butler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967